• This topic is empty.
Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7377
    James Pruitt
    Participant

    Nate,

    You only need two examples. TRUCK 2 is for both the front and rear. The single high mount cylinder swaps sides depending on where it is used (front or rear).

    Truck 1
    Left side high/high
    Right side high/high

    Truck 2
    Left side high/low
    Right side low/low

    Brian

    #7378
    madonnasuffolk30
    Participant

    Brian,

    I looked at photos and reread what you said. I want to make sure this is correct for the brake cylinders:

    Any position truck (front or rear):

    Right side: high/high
    Left side: high/high

    Front truck only:

    Right side: low/low
    left side: high/low

    Rear truck only:

    Right side: low/high
    left side: low/low

    Nate

    #7380
    James Pruitt
    Participant

    Nate,

    Yes, this is correct.

    Brian

    @obermeyern wrote:

    Brian,

    I looked at photos and reread what you said. I want to make sure this is correct for the brake cylinders:

    Any position truck (front or rear):

    Right side: high/high
    Left side: high/high

    Front truck only:

    Right side: low/low
    left side: high/low

    Rear truck only:

    Right side: low/high
    left side: low/low

    Nate

    #7382
    princessclyne69
    Participant

    Pardon me for taking this discussion down to 4-year-old level, but where can I get an SD-40 (not a -2)?

    These would be the 1967 order, 700-719. They’re really still too late for me, and they weren’t permitted on my division as far as I know, but I’m curious.

    Ron Merrick

    #7383
    kenris
    Participant

    Ron –

    I think that Kato made an SD-40 in HO. However, the models were probably made with dynamic brakes. I’d look on ebay.

    #7386
    madonnasuffolk30
    Participant

    Ron,

    The new Athearn RTR model being discussed is a SD40 and not a SD40-2. The Missouri Pacific numbered ones they are selling were built in February 1969. I would think only a few minor changes would get an accurate 700-719 that you’re looking for.

    I’ve had enough former Mopac employees tell me that the Mopac would occasionally run unit grain trains with 6-axle locomotives from Atchison to Concordia on my line and is a good excuse to include the model. Even today the KYLE runs SD45T-2s and I have photographed U30Cs in the past on the same rail. From my understanding the issue was the 6-axle trucks on the steam-era turnouts. They had a habit to stress and tear them up.

    I’ve got one of the 3039 on order and look forward to receiving it. Here is a link to the announcement. I placed an order with Spring Creek Models where I was able to find a good price on it.

    http://www.athearn.com/newsletter/092515/03_RTR_SD40_092515.pdf

    Nate

    @mopacfirst wrote:

    Pardon me for taking this discussion down to 4-year-old level, but where can I get an SD-40 (not a -2)?

    These would be the 1967 order, 700-719. They’re really still too late for me, and they weren’t permitted on my division as far as I know, but I’m curious.

    Ron Merrick

    #7474
    Jim Dobbins
    Member

    I just realized I have several images of the 3038 already, except they are in either the full VMV Lease scheme, or in the VMV scheme with C&NW markings on it.
    Mixed brake cylinder arrangement of Hi-low under cab as you view the unit’s fireman’s side, and Hi-Hi on rear truck.
    So, that means the engineer’s side would have hi-hi on rear end and low-low under cab.
    I had been planning on doing the 3038 or 3040 in full VMV Lease scheme with C&NW markings on it, and probably using one of my undec. Athearn SD40 kits for said unit. :~)
    Now I need to look over both closer and see which has the “cooler” details/truck mix.

    Dan Schmidt

Viewing 7 posts - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.