Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9498
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Those sets are still listed for sale at The Company Store.

    in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9493
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    The Joe Collias set from MPHS.

    in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9490
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Yes, Although it was not originally MP (can’t recall what it was). I relettered and renumbered it. Here’s a pic:

    in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9488
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Here’s the numberboard pic.

    in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9487
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    I have used Cal Scale 190-260 for the numbers (will send photo later). Just had to grind off the dividers on the front so I could apply a single 4-digit decal. Shapeways makes HO scale doghouses. I have a pair that haven’t been painted or installed yet. Not sure how prototyically Mopac they are but they’re all I could find.

    in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9479
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Sooooo, since they MAY have changed the tender, I can model assuming they did and run the 1111 as a coal burner — guilt free?

    in reply to: Mikado Oil Tender? #9477
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    I’m semi-freelancing but based on the Arkansas/Missouri portion of the RR. I guess that means I should keep the coal tender as is and re-number the loco. BTW, is there any info to suggest that any of the engines with oil tenders got coal tenders later in life? These locos were delivered in the teens ans 20’s but I’m modeling late steam and diesel transition.

    BTW, the GP is really nice.

    in reply to: Bulk Rice Transport #9233
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Thank you so much. 1965 it outside my modeling era, so boxcars it is!

    in reply to: Steam Era MP Combine #8958
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Just an update. I had previously ignored Patrick’s earlier reference to the 60′ Walthers (nee: Rivarossi) cars as I have had really bad luck with older Rivarossi cars in the past. However, after some research, I discovered that the ones Patrick is talking about were newer versions and much superior cars. Although out of production, I found one on e-bay and am very happy with it.

    in reply to: Steam Era MP Combine #8894
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    I tried running one of my derailing Spectrum cars in between my pair of Athearn standard passenger cars and it ran my entire layout clean. Maybe I can use a Bachmann combine after all: Athearn baggage, Bachmann combine, Athearn coach.

    in reply to: Boiler Mounted Number Boards #8893
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    I got them and they look great. Thanks.

    in reply to: Steam Era MP Combine #6855
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Loosely, late ’30s to diesel transition. My layout (under construction) is somewhat small and the Spectrum cars, while nice, have derailing issues on it . I have had better luck with well tuned up Athearn blue box coaches (thanks to the MPHS decal sets) but they don’t make a combine – just baggage and RPOs, hence my interest in the Pullman. But if MP never had any or had retired them earlier, that doesn’t work.

    in reply to: Passenger paint schemes and engines #8097
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend your presentation. What engine was pulling that Train 15?

    in reply to: E-7 portholes #7958
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    When you say “new sides,” where would the cut lines be on the P2K shell?.

    Tim

    in reply to: E-7 portholes #7955
    tqvfjmin
    Participant

    Mr. Harris replied to my e-mail and said that this is the sort of thing shapeways does well. He has some P2K E unit shells and is going to look into it. Thanks for the idea.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)