Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: All Pullman passenger extra – Little Rock – May 1966 #8268
    Richard Ryker
    Participant

      Bill,

      I think you’re on correct in thinking of a touring company. I believe the NYC cars are all end-door scenery cars. But no dining cars??

      Dick Ryker

      in reply to: What is more active ……..? #7857
      Richard Ryker
      Participant

        Pat,

        I’d rely on this group, and the two MoPac groups on Yahoo. MPHS is trying to steer all serious discussion to this group for fear that Yahoo and soon cease to exist.

        Dick Ryker

        in reply to: Interchange among MoPac subsidiaries #7853
        Richard Ryker
        Participant

          Ron,

          I could only speculate and I doubt that would add to any knowledge base. All I know is that MoPac subs shared equipment for through trains, and head end cars were subject to per diem charges. Mail/express was heavier to the southwest than in reverse.

          Any thing else would be conjecture and subject to the amount of bourbon I had consumed before the conversation started.

          in reply to: Porter Window Jack – recent donation #7831
          Richard Ryker
          Participant

            Quite an item, David. I have never seen such a device before.

            in reply to: MP parlor-coach-cafe service on trains 219-220 #7772
            Richard Ryker
            Participant

              So, this is a divergent question, does the copy of the parlor car tariff you own cover KC-Oma or Houston-Brownsville?

              in reply to: MP parlor-coach-cafe service on trains 219-220 #7765
              Richard Ryker
              Participant

                Bill-

                My Service Changes List indicates that a grill-coach replaced the parlor-cafe-coach on 219-220 on April 1, 1954. I can fond no other notations regarding that service. So, that contradicts your Official Guide information. Also, my file doesn’t show when grill-coach service ended either.

                Looks like it’s time for a timetable dive. . .

                in reply to: MP parlor-coach-cafe service on trains 219-220 #7761
                Richard Ryker
                Participant

                  Bill,

                  The diagram sheet I have does not have any notations regarding parlor seats. It only shows the change you described in your note.

                  in reply to: Heavyweight cars in Eagle colors? #7743
                  Richard Ryker
                  Participant

                    I would think a painting diagram would answer that question, Bill. Have any been published in the Eagle?

                    in reply to: 50 ft double door Express Eagle box cars #7655
                    Richard Ryker
                    Participant

                      It would have been so easy to get it right.

                      in reply to: Dispatcher train sheets #7555
                      Richard Ryker
                      Participant

                        Interesting question. I wonder why MP even recorded the consists. Other railroads, such as UP, did not.

                        in reply to: Cade Smith #7539
                        Richard Ryker
                        Participant

                          Which state, Cade?

                          in reply to: Rail Bus #7510
                          Richard Ryker
                          Participant

                            According to the book “Houston North Shore”, the Auto-railers were delivered in 1939. They were painted dark red and cream.

                            in reply to: Accurail announces a 36′ DS boxcar MP is on the list #7504
                            Richard Ryker
                            Participant
                              in reply to: EMD diesel Mars/Gyralights headlights #7384
                              Richard Ryker
                              Participant

                                Mars and Gyralite are trade names like Westinghouse and General Electric. Both companies provided various headlights, and oscillating lighting.

                                On the Missouri Pacific- Texas & Pacific lines, passenger diesels had a red oscillating light in the top light housing. The headlight was placed in the door. On early E units through E-7, the headlight was a single bulb with a large reflector. The red light was somewhat smaller since it had a separate housing that moved as a unit. The red light did not illuminate unless the train was stopped and discharging passengers. This would signal on-coming trains to stop. (actual rules may have varied by track and signal types. I’d read a rule book to be certain.)

                                On E-8 locomotives, most of the lighting was from Pyle-National. The head light in the door was now two sealed beam lights mounted horizontally. In the upper housing was a vertical twin beam unit with two oscillating lights. The lower light was red and served the function described above. The upper light was a white oscillating light used for alerting drivers that a high speed train was approaching. It was illuminated when the train was moving.

                                Based on photos in various books, earlier E-units were all eventually upgraded with the sealed beam units

                                in reply to: NewlyAnnounced Athearn SD40s. #7383
                                Richard Ryker
                                Participant

                                  Ron –

                                  I think that Kato made an SD-40 in HO. However, the models were probably made with dynamic brakes. I’d look on ebay.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 53 total)